Practice of Real Estate term

Sherman Antitrust Act

A federal law prohibiting anti-competitive practices such as price fixing between competing real estate brokerages.

Why Sherman Antitrust Act matters on the exam

This term belongs to Practice of Real Estate. The questions below are real items from Freehold's bank that use it - each one cites its source.

Exam questions using Sherman Antitrust Act

Every Freehold question shows why the right answer is right — and cites its source.

Two competing brokerages agree to charge the same minimum commission rate. This is:

  1. A lawful industry custom
  2. Illegal price fixing under antitrust law
  3. Permitted if disclosed to clients
  4. Allowed with board approval
Show answer & explanation

Illegal price fixing under antitrust law — Agreements between competing brokerages to set commission rates constitute price fixing, a per se violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act. Each brokerage must set its fees independently, and rates are always negotiable.

Source: Sherman Antitrust Act (15 U.S.C. §1)

Which of the following brokerage practices is a per se violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act?

  1. A broker independently setting a 6% commission rate
  2. A broker offering a reduced commission to attract sellers
  3. A broker advertising a limited-time discount on listing fees
  4. Two competing brokers agreeing on the commission rate they will each charge
Show answer & explanation

Two competing brokers agreeing on the commission rate they will each charge — Agreements between competing brokers to fix commission rates are per se illegal price fixing under the Sherman Act, regardless of intent, because they eliminate price competition between rivals.

Source: Sherman Antitrust Act (15 U.S.C. §1)

Two competing brokerages secretly agree that one will only take listings north of Main Street and the other only south of Main Street. This arrangement is an example of:

  1. A legitimate franchise territory agreement
  2. Market allocation, a per se antitrust violation
  3. Redlining
  4. A permissible referral arrangement
Show answer & explanation

Market allocation, a per se antitrust violation — Competitors agreeing to divide up markets or territories to avoid competing with each other is market allocation, which is illegal per se under the Sherman Antitrust Act.

Source: Sherman Antitrust Act (15 U.S.C. §1)

Related Practice of Real Estate terms

See every term in this area: Practice of Real Estate glossary

Drill Sherman Antitrust Act and 250+ more terms free

Every question sourced and explained. Guided Study Path, on-device coach, real exam settings for your state. No ads, no subscriptions, ever.

Get Freehold free
Freehold is an independent study resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by PSI, Pearson VUE, or any state real estate licensing board or commission. Freehold does not guarantee passage of any licensing exam.